LOOKING FOR A CHURCH THAT WILL PRAY LIKE THIS

The early church, namely the church of the book of Acts, presents to us an unbeatable pattern of prayer. How they prayed should be our utmost desire and envy. Their fervency in prayer was an over-flow of their minute-by-minute dependence on God. As persecution and suffering mounted, prayer issued from their hearts like an untapped fountain. And as they prayed, you can't help but sense as you read the text, a joy that is otherworldly. In Acts chapter 4, when their leaders Peter and John were put in prison, it unleashed a torrent of prayer that resulted in an in-filling of the Holy Spirit. Their praying was:

SPONTANEOUS - Acts 4:24 - Unrehearsed and united

SPIRIT-FILLED - Acts 4:31 - Only Spirit-filled saints can pray Spirit-filled prayers.

SCRIPTURAL - Acts 4:24-28 - Their praying was according to the revealed truth they knew from the writings of the Old Testament and from the revelation they had received from the mouths of the Apostles.

Oh, how I long for a church that will pray like this!

TIGER WOODS, BRIT HUME AND JESUS CHRIST

Unless you have been living in an igloo, by now you have heard about the marital indiscretions of famed golfer, Tiger Woods. I did not use the term "alleged" since Woods has admitted to marital "transgressions" and "personal failings" in an apology letter on his official website.

However, you may not have heard about a bit of unsolicited advise given to Tiger Woods by news journalist and former Fox News anchor, Brit Hume. Hume, in a bold, cut to the chase fashion urged Tiger to accept the "forgiveness and redemption offered by the Christian faith." For this advise, Hume has been vilified and ridiculed.

MSNBC's, David Shuster, called Hume's advise, "embarassing." Hume was lampooned and caricatured by Jon Stewart on The Daily Show. Additionally, he has been accused of proselytizing and disrespecting the Buddhist faith - the purported religion of Tiger Woods.

In my own, cut to the chase fashion, here are four things to keep in mind:

1. If Tiger is a Buddhist or follows some other religion, he needs the forgiveness of Jesus Christ.


2. Yes, salvation comes only through Jesus Christ. To say or imply this will always invite the wrath of those who are enemies of the Cross.


3. Brit Hume did what any true Christian (assuming he is one) should do - point a sinner to Jesus Christ and Him alone.


4. We must never kowtow to the pressure of putting Christianity on an equal plane with other religions.

The real crisis for Tiger Woods is not salvaging his marriage and career (though his marriage is immensely important.) The real crisis for him is the condition of his soul. A soul without the forgiveness of Jesus Christ will face eternal damnation and separation from God. Tiger Woods, just like all of us, needs a foreign rightousness that is outside of himself - an extraneous rightousness imputed to him by God through Christ.

This is the most important advise you can ever give a sinner. Brit Hume or any other Christian will pay a price for daring to do so. Tiger Woods will pay an infinitely higher price if he rejects it. This is no doubt the most important piece of unsolicited advise he will ever hear.

I pray that Tiger accepts it.

A CONCLUDING THOUGHT FOR THE BEGINNING OF A NEW YEAR

This is the time of year when most of us will look back on 2009 with a critical eye. Some of us, depending on how hard we are on ourselves, will hate what we see at best or feel like hiding under a rock at worse. As a result, we will resolve to do better - better with our money, better with our relationships, better with our careers, better with our health and better with our spirituality. Then there are those self-deceived souls that harbor illusions of grandeur and feel that they are just fine - no adjustments necessary.

Purse and Pride

Most people look at how well they fared in 2009 in terms of their net worth and self worth. Net worth has to do with our purse, whereas self worth relates to pride. The year 2oo9 with its economic downturn tested the survival of both. According to the Federal Reserve, household net worth hit its lowest point ($48.5 trillion) during the first quarter of 2009. That new low was preceeded by three consecutive quarterly declines in 2008. Many experts are saying that it will be quite some time before household net worth reaches the historic high just two years ago.

According to some experts, King Solomon, the wealthiest person in the Bible, had an estimated yearly income measured by today's value of over $280 million. Yet Solomon near the end of his life, saw the folly in protecting his purse and pride at the expense of pleasing God. I want to echo his concluding words about life at the beginning of this new year,

"Fear God and keep His commandments, for this is the whole duty of man." Ecclesiastes 12:13

Actually, the word duty in the verse was added by the translators. We can say that fearing God and keeping his commandments are the "whole of man." In other words, fearing God is the sine qua non of a life pleasing to Him. Without it nothing else really matters in comparison. Regardless of your self-assessment of how well you did in 2009, what really matters is fearing God and keeping His commandments.

What is the fear of the Lord?

The fear of the Lord is a desire or longing within us and a drawing outside of us to be close to God in reverential obedience.

God is the source of the longing within and the drawing without. He gets all the glory. Oswald Chambers wrote, "The remarkable thing about fearing God is that when you fear God, you fear nothing else; whereas when you do not fear God, you fear everything else." So, the big question is this, "What do you fear?"

Remember, whom you fear determines what you fear!

THE EFFECTS OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS ON THE EVANGELICAL CHURCH - Part 2

FIRST EFFECT - THE MOVING TARGET OF ABSOLUTE TRUTH: A CONVENIENT OXYMORON

In my previous post, I mentioned that political correctness (PC) has had four key effects on evangelicals. I earlier defined PC as the social pressure to influence the thinking, words and actions of a person or group by convincing them that historical, cultural norms are insensitive, intolerant and divisive. Before I dive into the first key effect PC has had on evangelicals, I want to first answer the question, "What is an evangelical?"

The definition of an evangelical has changed over the years. It is not unusual to find that evangelicals themselves have difficulty defining the word. Some in the news media have given it a definition that does not even remotely hint at its original meaning. In a recent article in WorldNetDaily, Michael Youssef, pastor of The Church of the Apostles in Atlanta, mentions how political commentators ignore the theological origin of evangelicals and simply use it as a term to describe the politically conservative. Youssef goes on to give, what I believe is the purest definition of the term, when he says the name is applied to a person or group who believes that salvation, redemption and justification come through Jesus Christ and Him alone. He further adds that a belief in the authority of the Bible also defines evangelicals. In other words, being an evangelical is ideally about the exclusivity of the Gospel and the authority of Scripture. With this definition in mind, one has to conclude that the foundation of evangelicalism is biblical truth - truth about the Gospel and the authority of Scripture.

A key effect of PC has been its assault against truth. PC sees truth as a moving target. However, pure evangelicals see truth as fixated, ageless and never evolving. Truth can be newly discovered, but it can never newly exist. When Jesus said, "I am the Truth," (John 14:6) He was in effect saying, "I can be newly discovered, but I can never newly exist."

Modernism rejected absolute truth outright, while postmodernism does not. Postmodernism seductively allows for a truth that is a moving target and constantly evolving. This notion of an evolving, absolute truth is oxymoronic and stealthily dangerous. How can truth be absolute and evolving? Both postulates are mutually exclusive. PC takes this postmodern definition of truth and seeks to make it mainstream. Moreover, the engine that drives this vehicle - the postmodern definition of truth - is PC. In fact, it is being driven down the aisles, through the pews and into the pulpits of many evangelical churches.

When evangelicals make truth claims about salvation and the authority of Scripture, we are exercising what I refer to as sacred audacity. Sacred audacity is the freedom to boldly make a truth claim that is solely unique to one's theology or belief system, such as the exclusivity of the Gospel. If evangelicals continue to kowtow to the pressures of PC, we will relinquish our sacred audacity to proclaim our long held beliefs and become more indistinguishable from other faiths. We have to keep in mind that truth separates us (II Cor. 6:17); truth sanctifies us (John 17:17); truth saves us (John 8:32).

Sadly, a recent report from the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life shows that many evangelicals are drifting away from a belief in the exclusivity of the Gospel. According to the report, 52% of American Christians believe that some non-Christian faiths can lead to eternal life. This disturbing statistic is clear evidence that postmodernism, through the apparatus of PC, has made significant inroads into the very fabric of American evangelicalism. PC has discouraged truth thinking, truth speaking and truth acting among evangelicals. There are a myriad of polls and surveys that show this - USA Today, Barna Group, and Association of Religious Data Archive (the ARDA), to name a few.

Only sound Biblical preaching can stem the tide of the PC assault on truth. God give us preachers with the sacred audacity to herald the truth claims of our faith without fear or compromise.

Next I will deal with the effects PC has had on gender roles in the church.

THE EFFECTS OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS ON THE EVANGELICAL CHURCH - Part 1

Over the past several decades there has been a gradual erosion of Biblical truth from the pulpits of evangelical churches and the theology of its members. I strongly believe that one of the reasons for this erosion is due to the subtle and dangerous effects political correctness (PC) is having on the church. According to WordNet, political correctness is defined as the "avoidance of expressions or actions that can be perceived to exclude or marginalize or insult people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against." My running definition of political correctness is the social pressure to influence the thinking, words and actions of a person or group by convincing them that historical, cultural norms are insensitive, intolerant and divisive.

Many have written and spoken out on the effects of PC in our Western culture and in other parts of the world. However, there has not been nearly as much outcry regarding PC in the church. This lack of outcry is evidence that PC has had influence. A politically correct church is a silent church. A politically correct church is a church with a muted message. It is preoccupied with the idea that the worst thing it can do is to offend the churched, the unchurched and all those in between.

The Bible is offensive and intolerant. It does not pass the PC smell test. The writers of Scripture make no apology for its claims. Paul concluded that the message of the Cross was offensive to many. He knew that if he excluded the Cross from his preaching, the offense would cease. (Gal. 5:11) In fact, Jesus is called a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense! (Rom. 9:33; I Pet. 2:8)

Over the next few weeks, I want to focus on four effects of PC on the thinking, words and actions of the church.

These four effects are:

The Moving Target of Absolute Truth - A Convenient Oxymoron

The Blurred Line of Gender Roles in the Church

The New Tolerance of Sexual Orientations

The Drifting Away from an Exclusive to an Inclusive Gospel